Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents a formalisation of two typical legal dialogue moves in a formal dialogue game for argumentation. The moves concern two ways of reinterpreting a general rule used in an argument, viz. by ‘unpacking’ and ‘refining’ the rule. The moves can be made not only by the user but also by the attacker of the rule, in order to reveal new ways to attack it. The new dialogue game is illustrated with examples from legal evidential reasoning, in which these types of moves are particularly common.
منابع مشابه
Comprehensive Decision Modeling of Reverse Logistics System: A Multi-criteria Decision Making Model by using Hybrid Evidential Reasoning Approach and TOPSIS (TECHNICAL NOTE)
In the last two decades, product recovery systems have received increasing attention due to several reasons such as new governmental regulations and economic advantages. One of the most important activities of these systems is to assign returned products to suitable reverse manufacturing alternatives. Uncertainty of returned products in terms of quantity, quality, and time complicates the decis...
متن کاملAn argumentation framework supporting evidential reasoning with applications to contract monitoring
In this thesis we present a framework for argument which aims to support concepts useful for evidential reasoning. The framework is presented at two levels, an abstract level, in which arguments are not treated as concrete entities, and a concrete level, in which arguments are underpinned by Subjective Logic. At the abstract level, the framework provides the theoretical underpinnings for the co...
متن کاملSubjective logic and arguing with evidence
This paper introduces a Subjective Logic based argumentation framework primarily targeted at evidential reasoning. The framework explicitly caters for argument schemes, accrual of arguments, and burden of proof; these concepts appear in many types of argument, and are particularly useful in dialogues revolving around evidential reasoning. The concept of a sensor is also useful in this domain, a...
متن کاملGod, Love, and Interreligious Dialogue
The monotheistic religions that valorize love typically believe that their love for God should be extended to God's creatures and, in particular, to one's fellow human beings. Yet, in practice, the love of the Christian or Muslim or Hindu monotheist doesn't always extend to the love of the religious other. Precisely how, then, should the adherents of the major monotheistic religions respond to ...
متن کاملModelling the Level of Adoption of Analytical Tools; An Implementation of Multi-Criteria Evidential Reasoning
In the future, competitive advantages will be given to organisations that can extract valuable information from massive data and make better decisions. In most cases, this data comes from multiple sources. Therefore, the challenge is to aggregate them into a common framework in order to make them meaningful and useful.This paper will first review the most important multi-criteria decision analy...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004